In These New Times

A new paradigm for a post-imperial world

HSBC to snub Chancellor’s £20bn loan plan

Posted by seumasach on February 19, 2012

This is yet another bailout- a handy 20 billion, but not enough to to prevent the inevitable: a run on the banks.

Telegraph

18th February, 2012

The British bank is understood to feel that the Chancellor’s loan guarantee scheme – which will see the Government loan money to UK banks to lend on to small and medium-sized companies – is not workable as it would prove to be too expensive under the structure being discussed.

This is because of the two separate charges the Treasury is proposing, which makes the fund more geared to banks, such as RBS and Lloyds, which benefit from cheaper wholesale funding. These banks are expected to report a combined loss of £4bn this week.

For HSBC, which is deposit funded as opposed to wholesale funded, the charging structure being discussed – which would add 200 basis points on to the cost of the loans – is believed to be unworkable.

Sources close to the detailed ongoing talks between the Treasury and the UK’s biggest banks indicated that HSBC remains part of the discussions, but that on the current basis the proposals appear to be a “non-starter”.

One source indicated that HSBC, chaired by Douglas Flint, wants to be constructive about the discussions, and supports the Chancellor’s notion of increasing lending to small companies in principle. But the same source went on to say that the bank was not about to agree to a deal whereby it actually increases its cost of capital.

A March 15 deadline has been set internally by the Treasury to complete the discussion for the loan guarantee scheme, with an announcement expected just ahead of the Budget, due on March 21.

Treasury sources indicated that the talks are ongoing and that the discussions remain practical.

Under the current proposals, banks would be charged a 100 basis point margin to comply with European Union state aid rules, as well as a further mandated 100 basis point to pass on to customers.

“It depends on your cost of funding as to whether that 200 basis point charge works,” said one senior banking source. “The challenge is to make the scheme work for all the banks, which could prove to be impossible.”

The Treasury is understood to feel that given the funds will be offered on a commercial basis, it is only right that a charge is made, as was the case in the Government’s 2008 credit guarantee scheme.

However, it remains to be seen whether some form of deal can be broached. Barclays, one of the other big four UK banks, is also believed to have expressed some concerns about the charging structure and is said to have asked whether there might be a range of charges rather than a fixed fee.

Another source indicated that concern over the charging structure was less important than the macro issue, of whether injecting the extra funds into the economy would actually stimulate growth.

Recent Bank of England data shows that net lending continues to shrink, as a number of banks continue to reduce their balance sheets, with growing question marks from certain economists over whether there is even a need for the extra £20bn.

The Chancellor announced the £20bn loan guarantee scheme at last year’s Pre-Budget Report, alongside a £1bn business finance partnership (BFP) scheme which will see funds distributed through alternative channels.

The Treasury is currently considering bids from a significant number of traditional fund and other managers to run portions of the BFP, with a decision possible at the same time as the loan guarantee scheme is announced. Discussions with the European Union over state-aid clearance for both schemes are understood to be continuing but remain positive.

Spokesmen for HSBC, Barclays and the Treasury declined to comment.

One Response to “HSBC to snub Chancellor’s £20bn loan plan”

  1. A greater problem is that most UK banks simply do not want to engage with the smaller end of the UK business market where these schemes have most relevance. All of the main banks seem to think that there is too much risk in lending to small business at a time when they are trying to rebuild their own balance sheets and retain enough capital to satisfy the increased regulations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: