Lisa Karpova

Pravda

9th August, 2011

Al Qaeda fighters have been fleeing from Benghazi and other areas of Libya following a bloody military offensive to dislodge them from the area, which has been under siege both from terrorist attacks on land and terrorist attacks from NATO aircraft.

Read the rest of this entry »

Leonor en Libia

http://youtu.be/Xe65Sbb2TEQ

franklin Lamb

Counterpunch

8th August, 2011

The quality of life continues to degrade in certain areas of western Libya while public anxiety noticeably rises over missing Libyan children as the first week of an unusually stressful Ramadan passes.

Read the rest of this entry »

Leonor en Libia

http://youtu.be/DiEba-M9k3o

Anti-war & Black activists unite against Libya war: Cynthia McKinney Tour now to 19 cities

Global Research

5th August, 2011

A continuing mobilization against the U.S. war on Libya has taken place in cities across the country. Packed, standing room only audiences at major meetings have heard former Congressperson Cynthia McKinney report on her June fact-finding trip to Libya with the Dignity delegation. In every meeting the message rings out: Stop the U.S./NATO bombing of Libya.

Read the rest of this entry »

How long is the world going to stand back looking on as NATO does its bloody work? Let’s join Roland Dumas in calling for NATO and the ringleaders amongst the western leaders to be before a court on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

PressTV

4th August, 2011

A mother and her two children have been killed by a NATO airstrike in the Libyan coastal town of Zliten, a Libyan official says.

Read the rest of this entry »

NATO’s “strategic blunder”

Cailean Bochanan

4th August, 2011

“Strategic blunder”: this is how Denis MacShane, Labour MP and ardent neo-con of the “Scoop” Jackson school correctly characterizes NATO’s Libya fiasco. This is not just a stupid adventure gone wrong, it is the collapse of grand strategy for the Middle East and Africa whose contours, to me, at least, are only now becoming clear.

Of course, whereas a successful strategy soon reveals its goals and the motives and thinking behind it, a failed one tends to be obscured by the mess it has left. Even more is it obscured by the remorseless workings of the law of unintended consequences. Who could have recognised the workings of a plan which strengthened the rule of two leading bogeymen of the West, Gaddafi and Assad; which strengthened democracy and sovereignty rather than further fragmenting the region’s nations: which strengthened tolerance in the face of the CIA’s obscurantists: which  strengthened the hand of Iran and, more especially, Russia: which left Israel exposed and which threatens to bring revolution to the heart of the empire’s regional policemen Saudi Arabia and Bahrain? But such is indeed the outcome of NATO’s misguided and plainly criminal enterprise.

The idea, supposedly being aired in Libya, that the revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia were a necessary prelude to the assault on Libya in that they removed leaders sympathetic to Gaddafi, cannot be dismissed. The CIA could then very well have had a hand in starting those revolts believing that any revolutionary process could be derailed by giving support to the likes of the Muslim Brotherhood who also seem to be at the heart of the armed struggle against Assad. I initially dismissed this idea since I didn’t see how it would work: I still don’t but perhaps this only goes to show just how much the CIA has lost it’s touch. But, as Thierry Meyssan has pointed out, the whole plan was posited on simultaneous displays of regime change in Libya and Syria. Had that worked out then perhaps the rest of the pieces would have fallen into place.

That has most decisively not worked out. In Libya what looks like the collapse of the TNC has been received with the most eerie silence apart from a few interventionist stalwarts lamenting the ineptitude of it all. In Syria, Russia has not deceived this time by failing to check the empire in the Security Council and without western intervention the West’s forces on the ground look too weak.

This can and must become a turning point in West’s post-Soviet NATO rampage. After the collapse of the Soviet Union the West won the ultimate ideological victory. To borrow from Baudelaire’s witticism, the devil, western imperialism, triumphed by managing to convince the world that he no longer existed. From then on he appeared in  humanitarian guise only: NATO was almost a charity although unable to conceal the cloven-hoof of its ever burgeoning arsenal. But those, it was claimed, were only to help his friends in the military-industrial complex and by no means for actual use. Endlessly intervening on behalf of the oppressed you could almost have said that he was doing God’s work and some, indeed, did say that.

That particular charade must now be exposed. A five year old could successfully identify the Evil One and if a chorus of thousands continue to sing his praises it only shows how many must go down with NATO.

Extract from “NATO war crimes, the murder of journalists”

Lisa Karpova

Pravda

3rd August, 2011

Speaking for Libya’s 2000 tribes, the Council issued a Proclamation signed by scores of tribal leaders from eastern Libya.

“By this letter to the extraordinary African Summit, convening in Addis Ababa, the notables of the Eastern tribes of the Great Jamahiriya confirm their complete rejection of what is called the Transitional Council in Benghazi which hasn’t been nominated nor elected by Tribal …representatives but rather imposed by NATO.”

Read the rest of this entry »

http://youtu.be/FLdoF7Xt9JA