Posted by seumasach on April 6, 2018
Pepe Escobar
5th April, 2018
As presidents Vladimir Putin, Hassan Rouhani and Recep Tayyip Erdogan met in Ankara for a second Russia-Iran-Turkey summit on the future of Syria, Moscow hosted its 7th International Security Conference attended by defense ministers from dozens of nations.
Posted in Multipolar world | Tagged: Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), NATO v. SCO, Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) | Leave a Comment »
Posted by seumasach on September 19, 2017
“Obviously, there is one result the Western sanctions produce – the targeted countries come together to create alternative poles of power. Threats and restrictive measures spur the process. This policy has failed to keep Turkey away from military cooperation with Russia. In the multipolar world there is always an alternative to turn to.”
18th September, 2017
The long awaited deal has taken place. A deposit has already been paid. Turkey has finally signed the $2.5bn (£1.9bn) contract with Russia to buy S-400 advanced missile defense system. With a range of 400 kilometers (248 miles), the system can shoot down up to 80 targets simultaneously, aiming two missiles at each one, at an altitude of up to 30 km.
Posted in Disband NATO!, Multipolar world | Tagged: NATO v. SCO, Russian diplomacy, Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Turkey-Syria-Russia-Iran alliance | Leave a Comment »
Posted by seumasach on November 21, 2011
Wayne Madsen
18th November, 2011
Israel’s all-powerful lobby in Washington, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), an organization composed of Israeli collaborators, infiltrators, and outright traitors to the United States, is steamrolling through the House of Representatives H.R. 1905 [1], which would prohibit the President of the United States, the Secretary of State, members of the U.S. Foreign Service, or any special envoy from engaging in any sort of diplomatic contact, official or unofficial, with any member or agent of the government of Iran. Only when the President informs the requisite committees may he proceed with engaging on diplomatic contact with Iran. Israel has de facto control over the foreign affairs committees of Congress, so any White House notification of the need to contact Iranian officials would be instantly transmitted to Binyamin Netanyahu’s office in Jerusalem and Israel would then circumvent any U.S.-Iranian contact. AIPAC, with its resolution, is further making the United States a vassal of the Jewish state.
Posted in Iran | Tagged: NATO v. SCO, nuclear war, SCO | Leave a Comment »
Posted by smeddum on June 14, 2009
by Prof. Michael Hudson
.
Global Research, June 13, 2009
The city of Yakaterinburg, Russia’s largest east of the Urals, may become known not only as the death place of the tsars but of American hegemony too – and not only where US U-2 pilot Gary Powers was shot down in 1960, but where the US-centered international financial order was brought to ground.
Challenging America will be the prime focus of extended meetings in Yekaterinburg, Russia (formerly Sverdlovsk) today and tomorrow (June 15-16) for Chinese President Hu Jintao, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and other top officials of the six-nation Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The alliance is comprised of Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrghyzstan and Uzbekistan, with observer status for Iran, India, Pakistan and Mongolia. It will be joined on Tuesday by Brazil for trade discussions among the BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China). Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Financial crisis, Iran, Multipolar world, New Cold War | Tagged: BRIC, end of imperial epoch, NATO v. SCO, SCO | 1 Comment »
Posted by seumasach on May 26, 2009
M K Bhadrakumar
26th May, 2009
The strange lineup of the member countries of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) for or against Sri Lanka at the special session of the body scheduled to take place in Geneva on Tuesday underscores the maritime Great Game unfolding in the Indian Ocean.
Posted in Multipolar world, Uncategorized | Tagged: NATO v. SCO, SCO, Sri Lanka | Leave a Comment »
In These New Times 