In These New Times

A new paradigm for a post-imperial world

Archive for the ‘Battle for Europe’ Category

Iceland, the Mouse that Roared

Posted by seumasach on March 14, 2010

This article elegantly captures the idea of real wealth trumping the fictitious derivative value created by the banks. It’s the banks who have to be put through bankruptcy not the real economy. But who would administrate such a procedure? The sovereign power, the state as an expression of popular sovereignty , alone can accomplish this. The state is also  a priority creditor in this process having channeled immense wealth, publicly owned wealth, into the hands of the banks- wealth that has to be recovered. Only the state can create the kind of public credit system we need. It is not for nothing that the financiers see sovereignty as anathema and seek to reduce the state to a private institution, a mere tool of oligarchy. The crisis, then , takes the form of the affirmation of sovereignty versus the negation of sovereignty. Unfortunately, in the anglo-saxon world , at least, the anathema against sovereignty is shared by the oligarchy and its critics: both oppose “intrusive government”. But we need government to “intrude” into the affairs of the banksters on our behalf.

I thought I heard something the other night. It was a distant sound, a low rumbling, a roar from some far off beast that had finally pronounced its presence. It woke me for a second, but it was so distant I felt no threat and simply rolled over and went back to sleep. The next morning I learned that Iceland was taking a stand. It was refusing to pay its British and Dutch debts. It is claiming the debts are a result of fraud, and it’s right. They have made the offer to pay some years from now, if they can afford it at that time, and only as a percentage of their GDP. This offer has been, of course, declined by Iceland’s creditor banks as they demand payment in the form of real assets.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Revolution in Iceland | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Payback ahead for Wall Street-Europe Retaliates against US Banks

Posted by seumasach on March 13, 2010

Posted in Battle for Europe | Leave a Comment »

Turnaround in Norway

Posted by seumasach on March 12, 2010

Iceland Weather Report

March 11, 2010

Somewhat unexpectedly, the Norwegian Foreign Minister announced today that Norway is no longer making the IMF’s review of their aid plan a condition for awarding loans to Iceland. This is reported by RÚV.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Revolution in Iceland | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

A new EU treaty? I see trouble ahead

Posted by seumasach on March 12, 2010

This is what I referred to when writing about Britain’s double game on Europe being exposed.

“A European Monetary Fund must create no financial or legal obligations on
Britain.”

This quote from Tory shadow minister seems to confirm that Britain will break with Europe over this. After all, it is Gordon Brown who champions the IMF as the instrument of global governance i.e. world domination by Wall Street and the City. EMF is a step too far for the British oligarchy.

James Kirkup

Telegraph

9th March, 2010

So, Angela Merkel says a new European Union bailout fund would require changes to existing EU treaties.

Now, I might be getting a bit excitable here, but I think this could be cause serious headaches for both Labour and Conservatives alike.

Start with the technical stuff. The reason Mrs Merkel is talking about treaty change is that the Treaty on the European Union (Maastricht, to you and me) both allows the creation of a single European currency, and forbids one member-state bailing out another. So if the EU is create its own European Monetary Fund to save Greece (and whichever member goes bad after Greece) then the treaty must change. So far, so good.

But hang on: when the Lisbon Treaty was ratified by the UK (yes, without a referendum), the Prime Minister promised that there would be no more institutional changes in Europe for up to a decade.

He made the pledge several times, including in the Commons.

For instance, Gordon Brown told MPs:

I can confirm that, not just for this Parliament but also for the next, it is the position of the Government to oppose any further institutional change in the relationship between the EU and its member states. [Hansard, 22 October 2007]

So, if there is to be a proposed change to the Maastricht rules (meaning a new “amending treaty”), will the Prime Minister stick to that line and oppose it? Or is he prepared to accept “further institutional change”? As I write this, I don’t know, because Downing Street doesn’t seem to know the answer. I’ll update this as soon as I get some clarity.

UPDATE: No 10 has confirmed that the policy is unchanged. UK opposes further institutional change in this parliament or the next. As for Mrs Merkel’s remarks, Mr Brown’s spokesman says: “We don’t actually expect further institutional change.”

(For the sake of completeness, I should report that, asked about the UK position on an EMF, the PM’s spokesman said: “I don’t think the Government has a position on that.”)

And what about the Conservatives? Well, they’ve given an almost categorical promise that any new treaty would automatically mean a referendum.

A Conservative Government would change the law so that never again would a government be able to agree to a Treaty that hands over areas of power from Britain to the EU without a referendum. [CCHQ website]

Now, a lot of people (including, I suspect, many who read this) would heartily welcome any EU referendum in the UK.

But Europe isn’t part of the Tory election grid. Being seen to make dire threats of referenda is not part of the image CCHQ wants to construct. So on this side of the election at least, Mrs Merkel’s talk of a new treaty could cause some Conservative discomfort too.

UPDATE: Yup, the Tories are rather tight-lipped on this. I have some comments from Mark Francois, the shadow Europe minister, saying “A European Monetary Fund must create no financial or legal obligations on
Britain.”
But there’s no comment on a referendum. The Conservatives are not, it seems, keen to pick a European fight right now.

Posted in Battle for Europe | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Why Italy faces a derivatives time bomb

Posted by seumasach on March 12, 2010

Globe and Mail

11th March, 2010

Financial markets are gripped by the role derivatives have played in Greece’s debt crisis, but Italy also has a derivatives time bomb, and hundreds of cities are in the €24-billion blast zone.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Battle for Europe | Leave a Comment »

Breaking Yugoslavia

Posted by seumasach on March 11, 2010

Interview with Diana Johnstone

Global Research

10th March, 2010

Diana Johnstone is the author of ‘Fools’ Crusade: Yugoslavia, NATO and Western Delusions’. She spoke to NLP on the wars in the former Yugoslavia, western involvement and the trial of Slobodan Milosevic.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Battle for Europe | Leave a Comment »

The Battle for Europe

Posted by seumasach on March 10, 2010

Cailean Bochanan
10th March, 2010
One of the key arguments against the Eurozone of its detractors is that it has at its heart a flaw, namely, that it lacks the political unity necessary to make a single currency possible. Now that the sensational news of a European Monetary Fund has broken the cry goes up of “economic governance”. This is rich coming from those who want “economic governance” for the whole world and illustrates the fact that no matter what Europe does it can’t win. Or can it?

Posted in Battle for Europe | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Europe bars Wall Street banks from government bond sales

Posted by seumasach on March 10, 2010

The EU is also trying to curb US financial power by creating its own monetary fund – a replica of the Washington-based IMF.The need of a European fund has emerged during the Greek crisis, as European politicians have insisted financial troubles should be resolved at home.

This is pretty sensational news and confirms that Europe is fighting back- Britain’s role as PIGGY in the middle will be interesting.

Guardian

8th March, 2010

European countries are blocking Wall Street banks from lucrative deals to sell government debt worth hundreds of billions of euros in retaliation for their role in the credit crunch.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Battle for Europe | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

I am not a criminal, insists billionaire behind Icesave

Posted by smeddum on March 8, 2010

Asked what happened to the bank’s money, Mr Björgólfsson claimed: “When you lose capital in this way, a lot of money goes to money-heaven. The value that has been wiped off the stock markets, the deposits in the banks and investment funds has gone. [It] has evaporated. It’s a common misunderstanding to ask: where did the money go?”

I am not a criminal, insists billionaire behind Icesave
One of the billionaires behind collapsed internet bank Icesave and its parent Landsbanki has denied being “a criminal” in a dramatic interview about Iceland’s banking crash.

By Rowena Mason
07 Mar 2010

Telegraph
Björgólfur Thor Björgólfsson spoke out in a new film ahead of Iceland’s crucial referendum on whether to bear the €4bn (£3.6bn) cost of Icesave’s failure.
Over the weekend, more than 90pc of Iceland’s electorate voted against a deal that would see the country pay back Britain and Holland for compensating 400,000 savers in the two countries.

Mr Björgólfsson and his father, Björgólfur Gudmundsson, the former owner and chairman of West Ham FC, owned 41pc of Landsbanki before it collapsed in October 2008. Asked what he would say to people who describe the bank’s owners as criminal, Mr Björgólfsson replied: “I have nothing to say to them. I am not a criminal and never have been.” He then detaches his microphone and walks off. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Revolution in Iceland | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Soros, Goldman, Hedge Funds Attack Greece, Euro

Posted by seumasach on March 4, 2010

Webster  Tarpley
4th March, 2010
It has been evident for some time that the ongoing speculative attack on Greece, along with such other countries as Spain, Ireland, Portugal, and Italy, was not primarily a reflection of their economic fundamentals, nor yet a spontaneous movement of “the market,” but rather an orchestrated action of economic warfare. The dollar had been relentlessly falling through the late summer and autumn of 2009. It obviously occurred to various Anglo-American financiers that a diversionary attack on the euro, starting with some of the weaker Mediterranean or Southern European economies, would be an ideal means of relieving pressure on the battered US greenback. Since these degenerate elites are incapable of directly solving the problem of the dollar through increased production, full employment, and economic recovery, one of the few alternatives remaining to them is to create a situation in which the euro is collapsing faster, leaving the dollar as the beneficiary of some residual flight to quality or safe haven reflex.

Posted in Battle for Europe | 1 Comment »

Le Parlement européen a t-il arrêté l’intégration UE-USA ?

Posted by seumasach on March 1, 2010

Jean-Claude Paye

Voltairenet

18th February, 2010

Au cours des dernières années, l’accès illégal de Washington aux données bancaires confidentielles des ressortissants européens était devenu à la fois le symbole de la vassalité de l’Union européenne, et la pierre angulaire de l’intégration de l’UE dans l’Empire transatlantique. Cependant, en utilisant les nouveaux pouvoirs que lui confère le Traité de Lisbonne, le Parlement européen a interdit la légalisation de cette pratique. Pour Jean-Claude Paye, il ne s’agit pas d’une simple péripétie parlementaire, ni uniquement d’une question de libertés publiques, mais bien d’un coup d’arrêt donné à un processus qui était publiquement débattu pour la première fois.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Battle for Europe | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »