26 April 2010

Hello All,

As you know, Reinvestigate 911 has the support of a key respected 
independent MP, Dai Davies, who is likely to be returned at the 
election. We plan to set up a Parliamentary Group to look into 9/11, 
7/7, and the bogus war on terror. The name and exact brief are yet to
be decided. Here are two ways we can make use of the election to 
help this project.
 Read the rest of this entry »

FROM REINVESTIGATE 9/11

www.reinvestigate911.org

Reinvestigate 911 has gained more momentum following Monday’s meeting
in the House of Commons. The meeting was attended by one Peer, one
senior MP and several aides to various MPs, some senior. About eight
more MPs from all parties had asked to attend but due to last minute
events and diary clashes were not present. (This is normal, the
system keeps MPs overburdened with meetings and short of help.) Read the rest of this entry »

Why NIST’s Final 9/11 Report is Unscientific and False

David Ray Griffin

Global Research

14th September, 2009

At 5:21 in the afternoon of 9/11, almost seven hours after the Twin Towers had come down, Building 7 of the World Trade Center also came down. The collapse of this building was from the beginning considered a mystery. [1]

The same should have been true, to be sure, of the collapse of the Twin Towers. But they had been hit by planes, which had ignited big fires in them, and many people assumed this combination of causes to be sufficient to explain why they came down.

But WTC 7 had not been hit by a plane, so it was apparently the first steel-framed high-rise building in the known universe to have collapsed because of fire alone. New York Times writer James Glanz quoted a structural engineer as saying: “[W]ithin the structural engineering community, [WTC 7] is considered to be much more important to understand [than the Twin Towers],” because engineers had no answer to the question, “why did 7 come down?” [2]

Read the rest of this entry »