There is no greater proof of the disastrous course of this war from a NATO point view than the fact that enemies of NATO such as ourselves are able to cite neo-cons like Bolton in defence of our case. His article is a futile rant against the inevitable ebbing of US power in the world.

But in the last four months, neither America nor its NATO allies have successfully identified and strengthened (quietly or otherwise), a truly significant cadre of pro-Western voices in Libya

This sums up the rebels: they are pro-Western but insignificant in terms of support from the Libyan people.

Reuters

20th July, 2011

John R. Bolton, the 25th United States Ambassador to the United Nations (from 2005 to 2006), is of counsel at Kirkland & Ellis and is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. The opinions expressed here are his own —

WASHINGTON, July 20 (Reuters) – With President Obama’s Libya policy staggering from one embarrassment to another, last week he and Secretary of State Clinton outdid themselves. They publicly welcomed Russia’s effort to insert itself as a mediator, an act of such strategic myopia that it must leave even Moscow’s leadership speechless.

Full article

Some journalists at the NATO press conference don’t believe the story that the destroyed antenna isn’t necessary for civilian purposes i.e. humanitarian missions which NATO claims it is facilitating:

Q: Yes, Brooks Tigner, Jane’s Defence. Just a small technical question on this air tower. If it was a key antenna site I assume there must be other back-up antenna for civilian landing purposes. If not, how are these aircraft being guided? Are you using the AWACS to guide them into the Tripoli airport, or what? Thank you.

Colonel Roland Lavoie: Actually, that antenna is not required to allow the landing of aircraft because its function was to track the air traffic from a distance. So it’s not to provide landing assistance at all. You raise an important point, however, in terms of backups. It is of use that there’s always the possibilities that some specific targets that we may engage could eventually be repaired and this is the reason why we constantly monitor with sophisticated intelligence airborne means the situation. And sometimes we have to revisit specific military targets to ensure that they are not repaired or reactivated.

Does this answer your question?

Oana Lungescu:I think it does. AP. Can you… Pascal, could you possibly just turn that off. Merci.

Q: Yes, Colonel, Slobo Lekic from the Associated Press. I used to be a commercial pilot. I have to say I’m surprised to find out that air traffic control doesn’t use radars to guide planes and to clear them for landing. As far as I know it’s routine procedure, especially when there are several plains in holding pattern over the airport and in conditions of low visibility to use the radar to keep a safe distance between the planes and both horizontally and vertically and to clear them for the final approach.

So, I have to say I’m very surprised that you would say that the radar isn’t necessary. I don’t know any traffic controller who would agree with you.

Colonel Roland Lavoie: Thank you for the question. The Triopli airport still has the ability to control the landing of aircraft, so I will not go into the details of that specific target, but I could assure you that air traffic, especially the air traffic that is authorized and legitimate, will in no way be prevented from landing in Tripoli as a result of that engagement.

And as I mentioned, no later than yesterday, just a few hours after that target was hit, there was a successful, of course, and safe landing of a humanitarian aid aircraft.

People’s Daily

19th July, 2011

NATO forces destroyed on Monday an antenna radar system at Tripoli’s main airport, which was being used solely for military purposes, the military alliance said.

Read the rest of this entry »

This NATO spokesman is the new spokesman for the ironically titled Operation Unified Protector- he is contradicting claims about the fall of Brega and emphasizing NATO’s supposed dissociation  from the rebels. This new NATO spin presumably reflects that organisation’s deep divisions over an increasingly disastrous war and is consistent with French statements to the effect that further military action is useless.

People’s Daily

20th July, 2011

A NATO spokesman dismissed on Tuesday that the military alliance had “direct coordination” with Libyan rebel forces, who fought their way into the eastern oil town of Brega.

Read the rest of this entry »

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

Pravda

19th July, 2011

Reports are coming in of a vessel carrying weapons, some fabricated in the United States of America, together with 500 mercenaries, sailing through the Suez Canal towards Libya. Certainly, western mercenaries have been captured. After a number of western lies have been uncovered, we see the truth coming out of Libya as we expose NATO’s lies.

Read the rest of this entry »

Middle East Online

20th July, 2011

PARIS – France accepts Moamer Gathafi could stay in Libya if he quits politics, under a ceasefire deal to end a conflict with rebels backed by Paris, the French foreign minister said on Wednesday.

Read the rest of this entry »

Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya

Global Research

17th July, 2011

 NATO started a bombing Blitzkrieg in Tripoli which lasted initially for almost two hours, from approximately 12:00 to 12:30 a.m. EET to 2:00 a.m. local time (EET). Then there was a period of silence until approximately 2:30 a.m. and later at 2:45 a.m. EET large explosions could be heard in the distance.

Read the rest of this entry »