In These New Times

A new paradigm for a post-imperial world

Author Archive

The Audacity of Israel

Posted by seumasach on June 6, 2010

We here in the U.S. need to demand that our tax dollars stop going to help Israel violently occupy Palestine and help Israel be a major destabilization force in the region, but we also need to look at our own complicity. What good does it do to go to an occasional protest and hold signs, no matter how clever they are, but still finance our country’s war crimes and crimes against humanity by paying our own pound of flesh to the Empire?

Cindy Sheehan

Desert Peace

5th June, 2010

“Until all of Gaza is destroyed the job is not done.”

Words on a sign of a Zionist in San Francisco

Since my son was killed in Iraq and I have come to prominence in the peace movement, the name I am called with the second highest frequency (behind “anti-American”) is “anti-Semitic.’

First of all, isn’t it interesting if one is anti-violence and pro-peace, that automatically makes one anti-American and anti-Semitic? That just tells us that violence and oppression are so inherently institutionalized in our cultures, that if one is against these things, that makes one against the entire culture, race or way of life.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Palestine | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Electrosensitivity- A scientist speaks

Posted by seumasach on June 6, 2010

As a scientist Dr Paddy Reagan knows that ICNIRP isn’t a thoroughly corrupt body that thinks Chernobyl didn’t constitute a significant public health threat. He knows WHO and the HPA “have no axe to grind”. He knows that millions of people claiming to be effected by proximity to EM emitting devices doesn’t constitute evidence  because there might be some other explanation. He knows that controlling the review process is the best way to weed out studies which aren’t “useful”  He knows  no effect doesn’t mean there is absolutely no effect- there could be some effect but not very much and that’s just tough luck anyway. He boasts that, as a physicist, he knows that moving electrons generate electric fields but does he know anything about biology and, in particular, the role of EM radiation in life processes?

Posted in Ecological and Public Health Crisis | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Man survives two Israeli attacks

Posted by seumasach on June 6, 2010

Posted in Palestine | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

City losing its buzz?

Posted by seumasach on June 6, 2010

Mumbai Mirror

6th June, 2010

Humans will not be the lone beneficiaries of a study recently sought by the chief minister on the ill-effects of radiation from cellphones and Mumbai’s 1,000-plus cellphone towers. The initiative may just come to the timely rescue of the city’s endangered honeybee population.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Colony Collapse Disorder | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

The HAARP project and non-lethal weapons.

Posted by seumasach on June 6, 2010

Europeran Parliament

9th February, 1998

The hearing on the HAARP project and non-lethal weapons was held in connection with a European Parliament own-initiative report, to be drawn up by Maj Britt THEORIN (PES, S), on the possible use of military resources in environmental strategies.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Drive to Global War, Ecological and Public Health Crisis | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Rebalancing the world

Posted by seumasach on June 5, 2010

Outside of Western diplomatic circles it is already widely appreciated that the May 17 agreement reveals the exciting reality of a new geopolitical landscape in which the countries of the global South are now beginning to act as subjects, and no longer content to be mere objects in scenarios devised in the North. At some point this reality might well be christened as the “real new world order”!

Richard Falk

Today’s Zaman

5th June, 2010

It may turn out that May 17, 2010, will be remembered as an important milestone on the road to a real new world order. Remember that the phrase “new world order” came to prominence in 1990 after Iraq’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait. It was used by George W. H. Bush, the elder of the two Bush presidents, to signify the possibility after the end of the Cold War to find a consensus within the UN Security Council enabling a unified response to aggressive war. The new world order turned out to be a mobilizing idea invoked for a particular situation. The United States did not want to create expectations that it would always be available to lead a coalition against would-be breakers of world peace. The whole undertaking of a “new world order” disappeared from diplomacy right after the First Gulf War of 1991. What one wonders now is whether the Brazilian/Turkish effort to resolve the Iran nuclear crisis with the West is not expressive of a new world, this time a “real new world order.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Iran, Multipolar world | Leave a Comment »

Israeli Murders, NATO and Afghanistan

Posted by seumasach on June 4, 2010

Craig Murray

I was in the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office for over 20 years and a member of its senior management structure for six years, I served in five countries and took part in 13 formal international negotiations, including the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea and a whole series of maritime boundary treaties. I headed the FCO section of a multidepartmental organisation monitoring the arms embargo on Iraq.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Afghanistan, Palestine | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

The European Radical Left Programme

Posted by seumasach on June 3, 2010

Cailean Bochanan

3rd June, 2010

The European radical left programme is a broadly positive document. It takes a clear stand against the austerity programmes being put into effect throughout Europe, it calls for an end to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, an end to NATO and calls for a public banking system.

However, there is a notable omission: there is no call to follow the measures implemented by Angela Merkel banning derivatives trading with a view to curbing the speculative attack on the Euro and the Eurozone as a whole. It is most striking that not only leftist governments such as those of Zapatero and Papandreou but also leftist forces on the ground have failed to pick up on this historic and possibly decisive initiative. We are thus faced in Greece and Spain with the classic scenario of class struggle, but with leftists on both sides, those in government calling for austerity and those manning the barricades opposing them. But can this conflict be reduced to this?

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

Attaque contre la flottille de la liberté : un crime de guerre

Posted by seumasach on June 3, 2010

La propagande qui accompagne l’intervention militaire israélienne contre la Flottille de la liberté vise principalement à masquer la qualification juridique de cet acte. Ainsi, lors du débat au Conseil de sécurité, 13 délégations ont dénoncé les violations du droit international, tandis que 2 autres (les Etats-Unis et la France) se sont contentées d’exprimer leur compassion pour les victimes et de déplorer un usage disproportionné de la force. Me Gilles Devers rappelle ici que cette attaque constitue un crime de guerre —ce qu’à vrai dire personne ne conteste, mais que Washington et Paris voudraient ignorer—.

Gille Devers

Voltairenet

2nd June, 2010

Une violation jamais connue de la IV° Convention de Genève

L’attitude de l’Etat d’Israël vis-à-vis du territoire palestinien de Gaza s’analyse dans la durée comme une violation, à un niveau jamais atteint, du droit international. En droit international humanitaire, l’occupation est acceptée comme une situation temporaire, le temps nécessaire à la recherche de la paix. Mais, rien en droit ne peut justifier une occupation de plus 43 ans, sauf la volonté de laminer l’adversaire. C’est que fait Israël, devenu un lieu de culture de l’apartheid [1]. Et alors qu’au titre de la IV° Convention de Genève, la puissance occupante doit la protection à la population, Israël a imposé aux Palestiniens, fait unique dans l’histoire, un blocus économique, qui constitue une punition collective. Enfin, Israël a conduit l’opération militaire Plomb Durcien décembre 2008 – janvier 2009 [2]sur cette population qui n’avait la possibilité ni de se protéger, ni de fuir, et le blocus a été maintenu empêchant l’organisation des secours. Début 2010, l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) a démontré que la réponse à des besoins primaires de santé est devenue impossible.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Palestine | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Kyrgyzstan’s ‘Roza Revolution’ – cui bono: (part 4) Washington and the Kyrgyz future—securing the pivot

Posted by seumasach on June 3, 2010

In this final part, F. William Engdhal explains why the stakes for Washington in the Kyrgyzstan events are of vital geopolitical importance. Central Asia is key for Washington’s strategy of global dominance, hinging on the militarization of the entire region. To this end, time-tested tactics of Low Intensity Warfare are generating the pretext for NATO’s permanent expansion under the guise of the ‘war on terror’, with opium gainfully fueling the operations. In Central Asia, as Engdhal suggests, the survival of the U.S. empire hangs in the balance.

F.William Engdahl

Voltairenet

2nd June, 2010

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 a prime strategic objective of the Pentagon and of US intelligence has been to deeply penetrate the former Soviet states of Central Asia. The Pentagon pressed for increasing US military presence in the region and succeeded in seducing four of the five central Asian states, including Kyrgyzstan, into NATO’s Partnership for Peace in 1994.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Afghanistan | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

A plague upon the world: the USA is a “failed state”

Posted by seumasach on June 2, 2010

Interview with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary US Treasury, Associate Editor Wall Street Journal, Professor of Political Economy Center for Strategic and International StudiesGeorgetown University Washington DC.

Question:  Dr. Roberts,  the United States is regarded as the most successful state in the world today. What is responsible for American success?

Dr. Roberts:  Propaganda. If truth be known, the US is a failed state. More about that later. The US owes its image of success to: (1) the vast lands and mineral resources that the US “liberated” with violence from the native inhabitants, (2) Europe’s, especially Great Britain’s, self-destruction in World War I and World War II, and (3) the economic destruction of Russia and most of Asia by communism or socialism.

After World War II, the US took the reserve currency role from Great Britain. This made the US dollar the world money and permitted the US to pay its import bills in its own currency. World War II’s destruction of the other industrialized countries left the US as the only country capable of supplying products to world markets. This historical happenstance created among Americans the impression that they were a favored people. Today the militarist neoconservatives speak of the United States as “the indispensable nation.”  In other words, Americans are above all others, except, of course, Israelis.

To American eyes a vague “terrorist threat,” a creation of their own government, is sufficient justification for naked aggression against Muslim peoples and for an agenda of world hegemony.

This hubristic attitude explains why among most Americans there is no remorse over the one million Iraqis killed and the four million Iraqis displaced by a US invasion and occupation that were based entirely on lies and deception. It explains why there is no remorse among most Americans for the countless numbers of Afghans who have been cavalierly murdered by the US military, or for the Pakistani civilians murdered by US drones and “soldiers” sitting in front of video screens. It explains why there is no outrage among Americans when the Israelis bomb Lebanese civilians and Gazacivilians.  No one in the world will believe that Israel’s latest act of barbarity, the murderous attack on the international aid flotilla to Gaza, was not cleared with Israel’s American enabler.

Question:  You said that the US was a failed state. How can that be? What do you mean?

Roberts:  The war on terror, invented by the George W. Bush/Dick Cheney regime, destroyed the US Constitution and the civil liberties that the Constitution embodies. The Bill of Rights has been eviscerated. The Obama regime has institutionalized the Bush/Cheney assault on American liberty. Today, no American has any rights if he or she is accused of “terrorist” activity. The Obama regime has expanded the vague definition of “terrorist activity” to include “domestic extremist,” another undefined and vague category subject to the government’s discretion.  In short, a “terrorist” or a “domestic extremist” is anyone who dissents from a policy or a practice that the US government regards as necessary for its agenda of world hegemony.

Unlike some countries, the US is not an ethic group. It is a collection of diverse peoples united under the Constitution. When the Constitution was destroyed, the US ceased to exist. What exists today are power centers that are unaccountable. Elections mean nothing, as both parties are dependent on the same powerful interest groups for campaign funds. The most powerful interest groups are the military/security complex, which includes the Pentagon, the CIA, and the corporations that service them, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, the oil industry that is destroying the Gulf of Mexico, Wall Street (investment banks and hedge funds), the insurance companies, the pharmaceutical companies, and the agri-companies that produce food of questionable content.

These corporate powers comprise an oligarchy that cannot be dislodged by voting. Ever since “globalism” was enacted into law, the Democrats have been dependent on the same corporate sources of income as the Republicans, because globalism destroyed the labor unions. Consequently, there is no difference between  the Republicans and Democrats, or no meaningful difference.

The “war on terror” completed the constitutional/legal failure of the US. The US has also failed economically. Under Wall Street pressure for short-term profits, US corporations have moved offshore their production for US consumer markets. The result has been to move US GDP and millions of well-paid US jobs to countries, such as China and India, where labor and professional expertise are cheap. This practice has been going on since about 1990.

After 20 years of offshoring US production, which destroyed American jobs and federal, state and local tax base, the US unemployment rate, as measured by US government methodology in 1980, is over 20 percent. The ladders of upward mobility have been dismantled. Millions of young Americans with university degrees are employed as waitresses and bartenders. Foreign enrollment comprises a larger and larger percentage of US universities as the American population finds that a university degree has been negated by the offshoring of the jobs that the graduates expected.

When US offshored production re-enters the US as imports, the trade balance deteriorates. Foreigners use their surplus dollars to purchase existing US assets.
Consequently, dividends, interest, capital gains, tolls from toll roads, rents, and profits, now flow abroad to foreign owners, thus increasing the pressure on the US dollar. The US has been able to survive the mounting claims of foreigners against US GDP because the US dollar is the reserve currency. However, the large US budget and trade deficits will put pressures on the dollar that will become too extreme for the dollar to be able to sustain this role. When the dollar fails, the USpopulation will be impoverished.

The US is heavily indebted, both the government and the citizens. Over the last decade there has been no growth in family income. The US economy was kept going through the expansion of consumer debt. Now consumers are so heavily indebted that they cannot borrow more. This means that the main driving force of the US economy, consumer demand, cannot increase. As consumer demand comprises 70% of the economy, when consumer demand cannot increase, there can be no economic recovery.

The US is a failed state also because there is no accountability to the people by corporations or by government at any level, whether state, local, or federal. British Petroleum is destroying the Gulf of Mexico. The US government has done nothing. The Obama regime’s response to the crisis is more irresponsible than the Bush regime’s response to Hurricane Katrina. Wetlands and fisheries are being destroyed by unregulated capitalist greed and by a government that treats the environment with contempt. The tourist economy of Florida is being destroyed. The external costs of drilling in deep waters exceeds the net worth of the oil industry. As a result of the failure of the American state, the oil industry is destroying one of the world’s most valuable ecological systems.

Question:  What can be done?

Roberts:  The American people are lost in la-la land. They have no idea that their civil liberties have been forfeited. They are only gradually learning that their economic future is compromised. They have little idea of the world’s growing hatred of Americans for their destruction of other peoples. In short, Americans are full of themselves. They have no idea of the disasters that their ignorance and inhumanity have brought upon themselves and upon the world.

Much of the world, looking at a country that appears both stupid and inhumane, wonders at Americans’ fine opinion of themselves. Is America the virtuous “indispensable nation” of neoconservative propaganda, or is America a plague upon the world?

Posted in Financial crisis | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »