In These New Times

A new paradigm for a post-imperial world

Author Archive

The stench of American hypocrisy: crimes of torture and “the American dream” Part II

Posted by seumasach on November 22, 2010

In a recent column, “The Stench of American Hypocrisy,” I noted that US public officials and media are on their high horse about the rule of law in Burma while the rule of law collapses unremarked in the US. Americans enjoy beating up other peoples for American sins. Indeed, hypocrisy has become the defining characteristic of the United States.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Quantitative easing: blaming China for the failures of US monetary policy

Posted by seumasach on November 22, 2010

Prof.Michael Hudson

Global Research

22nd November, 2010

Here’s the quandary that the U.S. economy is in: The Fed’s quantitative easing policy– creating more liquidity so that banks can lend more – aims at helping the economy “borrow its way out of debt.” But banks are not lending more, for the simple reason that a third of U.S. real estate already is in negative equity, while small and medium-sized businesses (which have created most of the new jobs in America for the past few decades) have seen their preferred collateral (real estate and sales orders) shrink. How can banks be expected to lend more to re-inflate the economy’s asset prices while wages and consumer prices continue to drift down? The “real” economy as a whole therefore must shrink.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Multipolar world | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Welcome to NATOstan

Posted by seumasach on November 20, 2010

Pepe Escobar, 2010

Asia Times

20th november, 2010

Be afraid. Be very afraid. At the Lisbon summit this Friday and Saturday, a gargantuan, innocuously sounding, self-described “military alliance of democratic states in Europe and NorthAmerica” that happens to be a Cold War relic sits in its own nuclear-adorned couch to speculate what it is actually all about.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Disband NATO!, Drive to Global War | Leave a Comment »

Is Irish bailout a back door bailout of City of London?

Posted by seumasach on November 18, 2010

Cailean Bochanan

18th November, 2010

When Obama announced his latest quantitative easing scheme I assumed Britain would follow suit. Surprisingly they didn’t. Usually we move in tandem with our American partners but here there was a divergence. I had argued in the past that the pound functioned in much the same way as the dollar as a global reserve currency though very much under its wing. What was going on?

QE2, the latest quantitative easing programme was an attempt to run another free ride at the expense of the rest of the world: in fact, the culmination of thirty years of doing exactly that. Wasn’t Britain interested in the same racket: we could do with it since we have nothing else to fall back on. Unless, that is, we have our sights on a free ride off the European Union.

Tonight’s Channel 4 interview of the Irish Minister for Europe, Dick Roche, gave a strange impression. Presenter Jon Snow seemed absolutely desperate to get Roche to admit that the bailout was on the way whilst the latter remained fairly laid back about it all. It all aroused my suspicion: are the Brits are using all their influence to bounce Dublin into this? Why?

The rationale behind the bailout is that it is necessary to prevent contagion specifically of the European periphery, notably Spain and Portugal. It is here , it transpires that UK bank’s exposure is massive: so there is more at stake than just £143 bullion invested in Ireland. Surely, this explains why the British response to this bailout is so different from their response to the Greek bailout. That was poo-pooed as, on the one hand, a sign of the imminent demise of the eurozone and on the other an attempt to shore up French and German banks exposed to Greek debt.   But this time the mood music is much more positive. We are even happy to contribute to it ourselves- a nice touch when you consider the likely beneficiaries- whilst allowing our eurosceptics to run a simultaneous moaning campaign. Incidently, David McWilliam, an Irish eurosceptic, anglophile economist and also a sudden enthusiast for EU bailouts has pointed the finger again at French and German banks notably neglecting to admit to the British interest. Is this the elephant in the room?

Let’s wait to see how this unfolds but I have a sense the Brits have pulled off a coup here. The implications are rather disturbing- already the EU seems to have shown weakness in dealing with the City of London’s hedgefunds.  Now Merkel has backed down precipitately over the issue of a haircut for Ireland’s creditors.The EU’s exposure on their western flank to City wrecking operations hasn’t been dealt with. Can the City really rerun a neo-colonial racket in Ireland courtesy of the EU?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Who’s bailing out whom?

Posted by seumasach on November 18, 2010

FT

18th November, 2010

Facetious title — but here’s an updated list of bank exposure to eurozone peripherals (in this case Ireland, Portugal and Greece) to ponder, as Ireland nears its bailout:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Why Britain can’t afford a meltdown in the Irish economy

Posted by seumasach on November 18, 2010

independent.ie

18th November, 2010

IT may seem strange that London has volunteered to help shoulder the cost of any Irish bailout when Britain has remained resolutely outside the eurozone.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Battle for Europe | Leave a Comment »

Dr Kelly was murdered: British experts

Posted by seumasach on November 17, 2010

PressTV

16th November, 2010

 
Experts also called on the police to launch a murder inquiry into Dr Kelly’s death, casting serious doubt on the official claim the scientist overdosed on painkillers.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

On housing benefit cuts, British public reveals shocking lack of empathy and compassion

Posted by seumasach on November 17, 2010

Andy Worthington

Uruknet

Such is the hostility in this country towards the poor and the unemployed — a sure sign of the distressing decline of empathy and compassion in the last 30 years — that a poll conducted by Channel 4 News this week found that 58 percent of people thought that the govermment’s proposed welfare cuts should have been more severe, or were “about right,” and 66 percent of people answered yes to the question, “Should there be a maximum limit of £400 a week on the amount of housing benefit that people can claim, even if this means people are forced to move house?”

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in UK economy | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

NATO’s Iran ‘threat’ conundrum

Posted by seumasach on November 17, 2010

Kaveh L Afrasiabi

Asia Times

17th November. 2010

 

Ahead of its much-anticipated summit in Lisbon this weekend, the 28-nation military alliance North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is in a conundrum – to name or not to name Iran as a threat. Either way, there will be unwanted side-effects.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Disband NATO!, Iran | Leave a Comment »

Have (infinite) war, will travel

Posted by seumasach on November 17, 2010

Pepe Escobar

Asia Times

18th November, 2010

Anyone aware enough to think that Washington’s goal is not to “win” the unwinnable AfPak quagmire but to keep playing its bloody infinite war game forever is now eligible for a personal stimulus package (in gold).

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Afghanistan | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Death of Dr. David Kelly: disinformation, censorship and coverup by the British media

Posted by seumasach on November 17, 2010

Dr Stephen Frost

Global Research

17th November, 2010

Editor’s note:

Global Research is publishing what the “progressive” British press has refused to publish concerning the mysterious death of Dr. David Kelly.

Disinformation and censorship at the Guardian re: Dr David Kelly

In August 2010, I sent the letter immediately below in response to a Guardian editorial (see ANNEX 1) and an edited version of my letter was published (see ANNEX 2).  In October 2010, I sent a letter (see below the letter immediately below) in response to Vikram Dodd’s article (see ANNEX 3) and despite much discussion no response was ever published, even in edited form.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Drive to Global War | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »