Comments for In These New Times

Comment on Cameron’s conversion on the road to Damascus by Paul Anderson

Paul Anderson — Thu, 16 May 2013 12:36:15 +0000

Another thing that must really hearten Cameron,http://en.rian.ru/military_news/20130513/181114993.html

Comment on Cameron’s conversion on the road to Damascus by Martin Dillon

Martin Dillon — Wed, 15 May 2013 13:44:53 +0000

great article Cailean. As you indicated, it will be far from smooth on the road ahead but it is nonetheless a ground breaking turn of events

Comment on Cameron’s conversion on the road to Damascus by Sukant

Sukant — Mon, 13 May 2013 22:24:34 +0000

Good article, brother. I pretty much made similar analysis on Press TV tonight. All the best.

Comment on Brussels abuzz over bee decline by dr. gerald goldberg,author:"would you stick your head in a microwave oven" "Too bee or not too bee"

Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:42:52 +0000

Though there is the appearance that there is insufficient science to back up the claims of the anti-emf proponents. A simple trial or recreation of the effects of emf on a very limited basis should be sufficient to establish that emf has a disorienting effect on bee behavior, prior to allowing a mast tower to being erected. The fact that emf has an effect is seperate from the presumption that science needs to have an understanding of nature to deem it safe or not. Indeed such a point of view promulgates a science of ignorance with no basis in understanding subject to the whims and abuses of self-interest and power with an utter disregard for life itself.

Comment on What did Thatcher achieve? by jon

jon — Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:39:03 +0000

It is just the law of the jungle. And she was queen of the big cats who beat everybody who crossed her path. To say she provoked the unions is wrong. She did prepare for the miners strike since Scargill wanted to bring down her government. Both of them screwed up the miners, in their egotistic war to the death. As for the falklands, what was she supposed to do after the fascists landed on that island that since 1833 they had no interest in, but sudeenly because of oil they decided to invade. As for your idea she kept the Northern ireland troubles brewing is ridicolous. She signed the anglo-Ireland agreement to the anger of Unionists. The republican propagandists, the best in the world, claim she killed the hunger strikers, I would argue against that since in recently released papers she offered the strikers the rights to wear their own clothes but the IRA refused. It was the IRA that killed those strikers, because if any had pulled out their families would have been ostracised which was a tactic besides terror that the IRA employed against their own people. Interesting historical analysis though, but too many generalisations and not enough analysis or close reading.

Comment on Obama demands a timetable for Israeli withdrawal by seumasach

seumasach — Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:25:16 +0000

Yes, Christof, it’s looking really good. I consult it on a daily basis. This story was quite a scoop and seems to be confirmed by Ynet. I see a big shift in Washington- let’s both hope your wrong about Kerry. Exciting and dangerous times.

Comment on Obama demands a timetable for Israeli withdrawal by christoflehmann

christoflehmann — Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:23:33 +0000

Thank you for referring to the article on nsnbc. Dis you know that on 25 February, I transformed the blog nsnbc into a daily, international, independent on-line newspaper nsnbc ìnternational . You can get free subscriptions to nsnbc ìnternational at the bottom left side of the wensite at http://www.nsnbc.me – Best regards and thank you, Christof Lehmann, editor

Comment on BioInitiative 2012 report issues new warnings on wireless and EMF by Joel Moskowitz

Joel Moskowitz — Sun, 06 Jan 2013 20:27:44 +0000

The report is available at http://www.bioinitiative.org. It was written by 29 authors from ten countries including ten MDs and 21 PhDs.

The strength of this report is that it was prepared independent of governments, existing bodies and industry professional societies that have upheld outdated safety standards. The report presents a solid scientific and public health policy assessment that is evidence-based.

“In twenty-one technical chapters of this 2012 update, the contributing authors discuss the content and implications of about 1800 new studies. Overall, there is reinforced scientific evidence of risk where there is chronic exposure to low-intensity electromagnetic fields and to wireless technologies (radiofrequency radiation including microwave radiation).”

“There is more evidence in 2012 that such exposures damage DNA, interfere with DNA repair, evidence of toxicity to the human genome (genes), more worrisome effects on the nervous system (neurology) and more and better studies on the effects of mobile phone base stations (wireless antenna facilities or cell towers) that report lower RFR levels over time can result in adverse health impacts. There has been a big increase in the number of studies looking at the effects of cell phones (on the belt, or in the pocket of men radiating only on standby mode) and from wireless laptops on impacts to sperm quality and motility; and sperm death (fertility and reproduction).”

“In other new studies of the fetus, infant and young child, and child-in-school – there are a dozen or more new studies of importance.”

http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/participants/do-we-know-enough-to-take-action

For discussion of other health issues related to electromagnetic radiation see http://saferemr.blogspot.com.

Comment on 60,000 patients put on death pathway by Meris Michaels

Meris Michaels — Sun, 06 Jan 2013 19:45:07 +0000

This reminds me of the article I just read on Care2 about cancer treatment in the UK:

A new look into cancer treatment in the UK has raised the alarm that people over 65 may be being denied the best cancer treatments because of their age, despite many being robust enough to withstand the treatments.

URL: http://www.care2.com/causes/sorry-youre-too-old-to-get-the-best-cancer-treatments.html

Comment on A New Religion: Eugenics, Occultism, and Vedic India in the Third Reich by Pamela

Pamela — Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:11:24 +0000

Excelent article. I found here bunch of connections with other dots. Even with many missed points. Manu was man of Vedic flood. We know date and place:Saraswati river at the end of the Ice age. Manu made law and send his 10 sons lead the nations. In Egypt as Menes, on Crete as Minos. Those guys went to Saraswati basin most likely from Aratta, Ukraine during Ice age. See Kamyana mohyla. Abraham as Ibrahim Zeradust come from Saraswati basin. Aratta is full of Swastikas. R1b DNA are not Aryans, better not Vedic, as they are all Basques. So they just adopted IE language as Vulgar Latin. Original Germans live somewhere northern Germany,Denmark,southern Sweden. Core of Today’s Germans in Germany are Teutons, with very mixed DNA. Sufism,kabala and gnosticism are Vedic origins. Hebrew is dialect of Akkadian same as Aramaic. Founder of judaism is Cyrus the great. Biblical Pharisee are Pharsi-Parsi=Persian. Because Cyrus built 2nd temple romans counted them as arch enemies-persians. Phariseism became rabinism and this became judaism. As Panini’s sanskrit it is questionable if people ever spoke hebrew language and just was not Sacred liturgical language. Hebrew was dead from 2nd till 19th century for sure. As latin comes from vedas the hebrew was most likely just language of priests and became Vulgar akkadian most likely.
This just some hints as payback for this great article