Comments for In These New Times

Comment on Salmond’s voyage to Oceania by seumasach

seumasach — Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:17:41 +0000

Yes, but being part of US empire is OK isn’t it Jon? That this is the underlying leftist view in Britain is exactly what I’m pointing out

Comment on Salmond’s voyage to Oceania by jon

jon — Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:50:55 +0000

this article was written with permission with those that fly in cloud cuckoo land. i don’t like the idea of nato. but then if it wasn’t for nato we would all be part of the soviet empire. so maybe i’m a dummy as well

Comment on The Birds, the Bees and Electromagnetic Pollution-update by parrotforum

parrotforum — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:31:53 +0000

parrotforum…

[...]The Birds, the Bees and Electromagnetic Pollution-update « In These New Times[...]…

Comment on The Specter of Debt Revolt Is Haunting Europe by US News Gateway

US News Gateway — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:49:38 +0000

US News Gateway…

[...]The Specter of Debt Revolt Is Haunting Europe « In These New Times[...]…

Comment on Beijing finds vulnerable ally in Berlin by seumasach

seumasach — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:43:23 +0000

Maybe- or a quicksand trap that sucks in hedgefunds speculating against a euro collapse that never happens

Comment on The GCC and NATO lose their leadership by seumasach

seumasach — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:41:42 +0000

Lot’s of murderous regimes out there Jon! Are none of them called US/UK?

Comment on Beijing finds vulnerable ally in Berlin by jon

jon — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:20:05 +0000

China needs Europe since it is a main market for cheap chinese goods. So china may be playing it cool, but they need a stable European economy. So europe is a quicksand trap that will suck up Chinese trillions.

Comment on The GCC and NATO lose their leadership by jon

jon — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:15:47 +0000

Russia and china are just biding their time. Do you honestly believe that they have principles? Get a grip! The US and allies want regime change in Iran and Syria. In the case of Iran it is going to be hard work, but in the case of Syria it is going to be easier since Assad is a murdering dictator and has alienated the rest of the world. China and Russia care about Syria or Iran, but they care about being surrounded by US allies, especially a US friendly Iran and Syria which would hamper Chinese access to resources from the middle-east. In much the same way the US and allies are in afghanistan, using military might to counter Chinese economic power in that region. That is the real reason for the occupation. As for chinese and russian diplomacy in Syria, they have played it wrong. better if they had stabbed Assad in the back and left him to the wolves. they have backed a murdering regime and in the long term they are going to experience a backlash where the west, the arab league will turn against them, and they will find themselves more and more isolated. That is exactly what the west wants, a China that is demonised in the world. China should have shown sense and backed the Arab league. And as for Russia..? All the hard work they did after successfully countering Cheney and Bush during the Georgian war have been squandered. the support for syria will turn them into a pariah state, and will spell disaster in the long term. Expect to see Putin and Robin ousted by a western supported russian opposition.

Comment on Sweden dismisses war against Iran as ‘stupidity’ by jon

jon — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:59:09 +0000

there is not going to be a war against Iran. the economic blockade is part of a co-ordinated attack to isolate all china’s trading partners. The CIA Clooney inspired carve up of Sudan was part of the strategiv vision.

Comment on Gran concentración popular en El Cairo acusa a Qatar por su apoyo a la OTAN en la invasión de Libia by Eduardo - Pagina web economica

Eduardo - Pagina web economica — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:36:50 +0000

No podemos permitir que el imperio de EU cometa tantas atrocidades en sus guerras injustificadas, no pararan hasta conseguir una tercera guerra mundial.