Reinvestigate 9/11
www.reinvestigate911.org
info@reinvestigate911.org
01273 326862

Iraq Inquiry ties itself in more knots. RI911 has been writing to MPs and Peers seeking support for our call on London’s Iraq Inquiry to start asking questions about 9/11. Tony Blair told them that the attacks changed the “calculus of risk” and hence were critical in the decision to invade Iraq. The Inquiry nonetheless wrote to tell us that 9/11 is outside its terms of reference. We suspect promises were made to the US as indicated by Wikileaks documents. A supporter is opening judicial review proceedings against the Iraq Inquiry. Our letters have elicited replies from several curious Parliamentarians including an eminent ex-Foreign Secretary.

Read the rest of this entry »

“All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;

the point is to discover them”

Galileo Galilei(1564 – 1642)

Veterans Today

24th September, 2010

Nobody in his right mind, nobody with the least critical thinking could possibly buy into the 9/11 official story of the reason why the world trade center towers collapsed – at free fall speed- like a house of cards into their basements in just few seconds- WTC building 7 collapsed in exactly 6.5 seconds. Something only very precise demolition can accomplish, something which takes days if not weeks to prepare.

Whoever planned the 9/11 operation and whoever managed to fool the masses of  terrorized people and tricked them into believing that al Qa`ida and its members of Afghanistan cave dwellers pulled this thing off did not consider that scientists and trained specialists would be the ones to finally expose the conspiracy and unravel 9/11 mystery.

In a previous post by the title “Danish scientist breaks the 9/11 culture of silence” We explained why professor Neil Harrits– a Danish professor of chemistry- believed the two airplanes- impacts did not cause the towers to collapse.  And according to a newly published scientific article, researchers found Nano-Thermite explosive in the rubble of WTC collapsed buildings that couldn’t have come from the planes. They believe large amounts of explosives were placed in the buildings in advance.

Neil Harrits and eight other researchers conclude in this article that it was Nano-Thermite that caused these buildings to collapse.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Richard Gage, AIA, Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) with former Senator Gravel, held a press conference Presenting Findings on September 9, 2010 at National Press Club, Washington, D.C.

They presented the group’s findings and called for a new investigation into the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.

Their findings are based on the following scientific observations and Hard Evidence of Explosive Demolition of the WTC towers.

As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers’ destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2. 
3. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
4. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
5. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
6. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
7. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
8. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
9. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no “pancaked” floors found
10. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front
11. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
12. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
13. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
14. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples
15. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

1. Rapid onset of “collapse”

2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building’s destruction

3.Symmetrical “structural failure” — through the path of greatest resistance — at free-fall acceleration

4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional

7. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY

In the the aftermath of WTC7?s destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:

8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples

9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses

10. Chemical signature of thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)

3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.

Thierry Meyssan

Voltairenet

14th September, 2010

In stark contrast with the glibness of official speeches on September 11, Thierry Meyssan offers his assessment of where we stand nine years after the attacks. His lucidity and steadfastness are bearing fruits. A large majority of people around the world no longer believe the US government’s account. In the United States itself, the most recent pole shows that 74% of the population actually doubts the official version. Even the chairmen of the presidential investigative commission now admit they are skeptical about their own report. The tenacious initiator of this debate believes that the controversy around the credibility of the official version is obsolete; it is time to urge the UN to take concrete action against the real culprits.

Read the rest of this entry »

RT

11th September, 2010

On the ninth anniversary of the worst terror attacks to strike the US mainland, many questions remain unanswered, not least of all concerning the true identities of the perpetrators.

Read the rest of this entry »

Thierry Meyssan and Gaia Edwards

Voltairenet

10th September, 2010

Kurt Sonnenfeld’s case is outstanding for at least two reasons. He is in possession of official documentation that contradicts the U.S. Government’s account of the 9/11 events. He is a high-profile U.S. citizen forced to seek refugee status because of his government’s dogged persecution. Any relation between these two facts is not purely coincidental. Voltaire Network’s second exclusive interview of Kurt Sonnenfeld, conducted in Buenos Aires, is presented below.

Read the rest of this entry »

Thierry Meyssan

Voltairenet

9th September, 2010

Le temps passe. Neuf ans après les attentats qui endeuillèrent les États-Unis, la lucidité et la ténacité de Thierry Meyssan portent leurs fruits : une large majorité de personnes dans le monde ne croit plus à la version gouvernementale des États-Unis. Ce phénomène s’observe jusqu’aux États-Unis, où un dernier sondage évalue à 74 % le nombre de citoyens pris par le doute. Même les responsables de la commission d’enquête présidentielle admettent ne pas être convaincus par le rapport qu’ils ont signé. Pour l’initiateur opiniâtre de ce débat, le temps n’est plus à discuter de l’impossibilité de la version officielle, il faut maintenant saisir l’ONU et poursuivre les réels coupables.

Read the rest of this entry »

Voltairenet

7th August, 2010

The official report by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) relating to the two planes that crashed into WTC on September 11, 2001 shows that they were traveling at a speed of 945 km/h and 796 km/h respectively.

Read the rest of this entry »

Anthony Lawson

rense.com

20th june, 2010

Extract:  …it would be a remarkable irony, and quite possibly a unique circumstance in the annals of American jurisprudence, if the assumptions used as reasons for launching wars against two sovereign nations, as well as the more generalised ‘War on Terror’ would not stand up as evidence in either a criminal prosecution or a civil damages suit in an American court of law.

Read the rest of this entry »