<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile phone child safety guidelines &#8216;to be dropped&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/09/01/mobile-phone-child-safety-guidelines-to-be-dropped/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/09/01/mobile-phone-child-safety-guidelines-to-be-dropped/</link>
	<description>"In these new times, in spite of the dangers, the most brutal force, the most fearful night, we are engaged in the fight  to survive."  No Novo Tempo-Ivan Lins, Vitor Martins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Lewin</title>
		<link>http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/09/01/mobile-phone-child-safety-guidelines-to-be-dropped/#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Lewin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthesenewtimes.com/?p=8729#comment-5980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The original article in the Mail and subsequently copied by other newspapers appears to be a figment of the Mail&#039;s imagination.  I have contacted the Department of Health and the Health Protection Agency and both have denied that such a &quot;draft publication&quot; exists. Is this a case of press sensationalism or deliberate attempt to provoke more reaction from the lobby advising greater precautions?  I hope the latter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original article in the Mail and subsequently copied by other newspapers appears to be a figment of the Mail&#8217;s imagination.  I have contacted the Department of Health and the Health Protection Agency and both have denied that such a &#8220;draft publication&#8221; exists. Is this a case of press sensationalism or deliberate attempt to provoke more reaction from the lobby advising greater precautions?  I hope the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paulstrom Southwalk</title>
		<link>http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/09/01/mobile-phone-child-safety-guidelines-to-be-dropped/#comment-5940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Paulstrom Southwalk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthesenewtimes.com/?p=8729#comment-5940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are those in the medical field that say expect the first wave of increased brain tumors in 2010 and then a second larger increase in 2015.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are those in the medical field that say expect the first wave of increased brain tumors in 2010 and then a second larger increase in 2015.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karlo</title>
		<link>http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/09/01/mobile-phone-child-safety-guidelines-to-be-dropped/#comment-5938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[karlo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthesenewtimes.com/?p=8729#comment-5938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spot on Mike S. &#039;Official&#039; advice on a whole range of health issues from mobile phones, safety of vaccines, radiation from power lines, aspartame.... is totally wrong. Countless independent research NOT industry funded B.S proves that our health is being placed at the lowest priority by this government. In my view ministers and leading industry experts should be held accountable for what is in effect &#039;Corporate manslaughter&#039; no less. People should be able to sue individual ministers after they have been jailed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on Mike S. &#8216;Official&#8217; advice on a whole range of health issues from mobile phones, safety of vaccines, radiation from power lines, aspartame&#8230;. is totally wrong. Countless independent research NOT industry funded B.S proves that our health is being placed at the lowest priority by this government. In my view ministers and leading industry experts should be held accountable for what is in effect &#8216;Corporate manslaughter&#8217; no less. People should be able to sue individual ministers after they have been jailed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor P</title>
		<link>http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/09/01/mobile-phone-child-safety-guidelines-to-be-dropped/#comment-5937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trevor P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthesenewtimes.com/?p=8729#comment-5937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notice that it&#039;s always &quot;guidelines&quot;. Not laws, but &quot;guidelines&quot;. And the UK&#039;s &quot;guidelines&quot; are among the most liberal in the world. In fact, according to the guidlines it would be OK for your child to (24/7, every day for the rest of the child&#039;s life) to be continuously exposed to ca. 5 times the radiation you get from a mobile phone that has a call. This can actually be the case if your home is situated close to a mobile phone base station. Or near several stations at once. Get yourself an electrosmog meter now! (f.ex go to lessemf.com)

(A mobile phone that has a call produces a field of ca. 8 V/m. The guidelines allow for ca. 50 V/m if I remember correctly.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that it&#8217;s always &#8220;guidelines&#8221;. Not laws, but &#8220;guidelines&#8221;. And the UK&#8217;s &#8220;guidelines&#8221; are among the most liberal in the world. In fact, according to the guidlines it would be OK for your child to (24/7, every day for the rest of the child&#8217;s life) to be continuously exposed to ca. 5 times the radiation you get from a mobile phone that has a call. This can actually be the case if your home is situated close to a mobile phone base station. Or near several stations at once. Get yourself an electrosmog meter now! (f.ex go to lessemf.com)</p>
<p>(A mobile phone that has a call produces a field of ca. 8 V/m. The guidelines allow for ca. 50 V/m if I remember correctly.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike S</title>
		<link>http://inthesenewtimes.com/2009/09/01/mobile-phone-child-safety-guidelines-to-be-dropped/#comment-5931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthesenewtimes.com/?p=8729#comment-5931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can tell who runs the country... and it&#039;s not the people. And they&#039;re quite willing to sacrifice your children to make a buck. How will you get control of our country?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell who runs the country&#8230; and it&#8217;s not the people. And they&#8217;re quite willing to sacrifice your children to make a buck. How will you get control of our country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

